Preview

Actual Problems of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine

Advanced search

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY IN THE TREATMENT OF PERITONEAL METASTASES USING THE PRESSURIZED INTRAPERITONEAL AEROSOL CHEMOTHERAPY METHOD: A SCOPING REVIEW

https://doi.org/10.64854/2790-1289-2025-49-3-10

Abstract

Peritoneal metastases are a common manifestation of malignant tumor progression in various locations. Despite the availability of systemic therapy and surgical approaches, many patients continue to face unmet clinical needs, reduced quality of life, and unfavorable outcomes. In response to these limitations, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy was developed in the early 2000s. While this technique has generated increasing clinical interest, concerns remain regarding potential occupational and environmental risks, particularly due to aerosolized exposure to cytotoxic agents.

This scoping review aimed to explore and summarize current evidence on occupational risks and safety measures implemented during pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy sessions for the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Based on available data, we also sought to identify clinical recommendations to ensure the protection of healthcare personnel and the operating room environment.

Materials and methods. Relevant publications were identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and eLibrary databases. Eligible studies described the pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy method, personal and collective protective measures, or organizational recommendations for safe handling of cytostatic aerosols in the surgical setting.

Results. The search identified 185 publications, of which 37 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies mainly consisted of observational reports, experimental simulations, and institutional guidelines. Key safety measures included the use of closed aerosol delivery systems, high-efficiency ventilation, personal protective equipment, and standardized decontamination protocols. Evidence of long-term occupational risk was limited, but most studies emphasized the necessity of strict adherence to safety procedures.

Conclusions. This review contributes to the evidence base supporting the occupational and environmental safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy sessions. The synthesized findings can inform the adaptation and standardization of multilayered protection strategies and training protocols for healthcare workers, thereby minimizing risks to staff and the operating environment.

About the Authors

A. L. Berkembayeva
LLP «National Research Oncology Center»
Kazakhstan

operating room nursing specialist



Zh. K. Burkitbayev
LLP «National Research Oncology Center»
Kazakhstan

MD, DMedSc, Chairman of the Board



J. А. Zainulina
LLP «National Research Oncology Center»
Kazakhstan

MHC, manager of the nursing management and development department



Zh. M. Kuanysh
LLP «National Research Oncology Center»
Kazakhstan

MMSPH, chief specialist of the clinical and fundamental research sector, department of scientific management



A. К. Kerimkulov
LLP «National Research Oncology Center»
Kazakhstan

MBA, senior surgeon of abdominal surgery



Z. Dushimova
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

MD, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Fundamental Medicine



References

1. Sugarbaker, P. H. (2019). Laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal metastases. Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery, 4 (4), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/ales.201

2. Gantsev, Sh. Kh., Gantsev, K. Sh., Kzyrgalin, Sh. R., Ishmuratova, K. R. (2021). Peritoneal Canceromatosis in Malignant Tumors of Various Localizations. Achievements and Prospects. Creative Surgery and Oncology, 11(2), 149-156.

3. https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-2-149-156

4. Guchelaar, N. A. D., Neijs, M. J., Noordman, B. J., Graaf, H. E. C., Hellemond, I. E. G., Sluis, P. C., Hoop, E. O., Lagarde, S. M., Verhoeven, R. H. A, Koolen, S. L.W., Luyer, M. D. P., Hingh, I. H. J. T., Laarhoven, H. W. M., Mostert, B., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., Mathijssen, R. H. J. (2025). The prognostic value of peritoneal metastases in patients with gastric cancer: a nationwide population-based study. eClinicalMedicine, 81, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103109

5. Kusamura, S. (2024). Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer treated with bidirectional approach comprising PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy. PSOGI World News, 1, 11-13. https://psogi.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/PSOGI-World-News-December-2024_Issue_1.pdf

6. Marz, L., Piso, P. (2015). Treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology Report, 3(4), 298-302. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gov044

7. Eftimie, M. A., Potlog, G., Alexandrescu, S. T. (2023). Surgical Options for Peritoneal Surface Metastases from Digestive Malignancies—A Comprehensive Review. Medicina, 59(2), 255. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/medicina59020255

8. Rijken, A., Lurvink, R. J., Luyer, M. D. P., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Erning, F. N., Sandick, J. W., de Hingh, I. H. J. T. (2021). The Burden of Peritoneal Metastases from Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review on the Incidence, Risk Factors and Survival, J. Clin. Med., 10, 4882. https:// doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214882

9. Kuchen, N., Cereser, T., Hailemariam, S., Schoeb, O. (2018). Safety and efficacy of pressurized intraperitoneal/intrathoracic aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC/PITAC) in patients with peritoneal and/or pleural carcinomatosis: A preliminary experience. Journal of Medicine and Therapeutics, 2(1), 1-6. doi: 10.15761/JMT.1000127

10. Reymond, L., Solass, W., Tempfer, C., Reymond, M. A. (2015). Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): occupational health and safety management. L. V. Berhardt (Ed.). Advanced in Medicine and Biology (158-179). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

11. Solass, W., Kerb, R., Mürdter, T., Giger-Pabst, U., Strumberg, D., Tempfer, C., Zieren, J., Schwab, M., Reymond, M. A. (2014). First PIPAC in-human application. Marc, A. R., Solass, W. (Ed.). PIPAC Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy – Cancer under Pressure (pp. 115-126). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.

12. Hoskovec, D., Krska, Z., Vocka, M., Argalacsova, S., Dytrych, P. (2024). Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosolised Chemotherapy—Results from the First Hundred Consecutive Procedures. Cancers, 16, 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/ cancers16081559

13. Nowacki, M., Zegarski, W. (2018). The scientific report from the first pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) procedures performed in the eastern part of Central Europe. The Journal of International Medical Research, 46(9), 3748-3758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518778637

14. Solass, W., Kerb, R., Murdter, T, Giger-Pabst, U., Strumberg, D., Tempfer, C., Zieren, J., Schwab, M., Reymond, M. A. (2013). Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Using Pressurized Aerosol as an Alternative to Liquid Solution: First Evidence for Efficacy. Ann Surg Onco, 21(2), 553-559. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3213-1

15. Tempfer, C. B., Rezniczek, G. A., Ende, P., Solass, W., Reymond, M. A. (2015). Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Doxorubicin in Women with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Cohort Study. Anticancer Research, 35 (12), 6723-6730. https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/35/12/6723.long

16. Di Giorgio, A., Macri, A., Ferracci, F., Robella, M., Visaloco, M., De Manzoni, G., Sammartino, P., Sommariva, A., Biacchi, D., Roviello, F., Pastorino, R., Marafon, D. P., Rotolo, S., Casella, F., Vaira, M. (2023). 10 Years of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers, 15, 1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ cancers15041125

17. Mohammad, A., Hor, M., Baradeiya, A. M., Qasim, H., Nasr, M. (2022). Is Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosolized Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Effective in Ovarian Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis? Cureus, 14(8), e27837. DOI 10.7759/cureus.27837

18. Bhatt, A., Mittal, S., Gopinath, K. S. (2016). Safety considerations for Health care Workers involved in Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative chemotherapy. Indian J Surg Onco, 7(2), 249-257. DOI 10.1007/s13193-016-0503-7

19. Vyas, N., Yiannakis, D., Turner, A., Sewell, G. (2014). Occupational exposure to anti-cancer drugs: A review of effects of new technology, J Oncol Pharm Pract, 20(4), 278-287. Available at: 10.1177/ 1078155213498630

20. Willaert, W., Sessink, P., Ceelen, W. (2017). Occupational safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura and Peritoneum, 2(3), 121-128. doi: 10.1515/pp-2017-0018

21. Graversen, M., Pedersen, P. B., Mortensen, M. B. (2016). Environmental safety during the administration of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura and Peritoneum, 1(4), 203-208. doi: 10.1515/pp-2016-0019

22. Solass, W., Giger-Pabst, U., Zieren, J., Reymond, M. A. (2013). Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): Occupational Health and Safety Aspects. Ann Surg Oncol, 20, 3504-3511. DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3039-x

23. Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Apprecs [Website]. Retrieved June 10, 2025, from https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/dsm?lang=ru

24. National Research Oncology Center. Apprecs [Website]. Retrieved June 7, 2025, from https://cancercenter.edu.kz/ru

25. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S. et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med., 169(7), 467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

26. Corporation for Digital Scholarship. Zotero [Computer software]. Version 6.0.37. Fairfax, VA: Corporation for Digital Scholarship; 2025. Available from: https://www.zotero.org/

27. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.

28. Pavone, M., Jochum, F., Lecointre, L., Bizzarri, N., Taliento, C., Restaino, S., Vizzielli, G., Fagotti, A., Scambia, G., Querleu, D., Akladios, C. (2024). Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of current evidence. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 310(4), 1845-1856. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07586-z

29. Chen, R., Yang, Z., Li, R., Yang, Y., Zheng, J., Wang, J., Li, Y. (2025). Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases: a comprehensive meta-analysis of feasibility, efficacy, and safety. Gastroenterology Report, 13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goaf040

30. Alyami, M., Hubner, M., Grass, F., Bakrin, N., Villeneuve, L., Laplace, N., Passot, G., Glehen, O., Kepenekian, V. (2019). Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: rationale, evidence, and potential indications, The Lancet Oncology, 20(7), e368-e377. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30318-3

31. Khosrawipour, T., Khosrawipour, V., Giger-Pabst, U. (2017). Pressurized Intra Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in patients suffering from peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0186709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186709

32. Esquis, P., Consolo, D., Magnin, G., et al. (2006). High intra-abdominal pressure enhances the penetration and antitumor effect of intraperitoneal cisplatin on experimental peritoneal carcinomatosis. Annals of Surgery, 244(1), 106-112. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218089.61635.5f.

33. Kurtz, F., Struller, F., Horvath, P., Solass, W., Bosmuller, H., Konigsrainer, A., Reymond, M.A. (2018). Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Metastasis: A Registry Study. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2743985, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2743985

34. Brown, Z. J., Krell, M., Gitlin, S., Ranjbar, S., Vega, D. A., Pawlik, T. M. (2025). Prospects of the surgical management of colorectal peritoneal metastasis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 29(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101940

35. Benoist, H., Eveno, C., Wilson, S., Vigneron, N., Guilloit, J. M., Morello, R., Simon N., Odou P., Saint-Lorant, G. (2022). Perception, knowledge and protective practices for surgical staff handling antineoplastic drugs during HIPEC and PIPAC. Pleura and Peritoneum, 7(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2021-0151

36. Clerc, D., Hubner, M., Ashwin, K. R., Somashekhar, S. P., Rau, B., Ceelen, W., Willaert, W., Bakrin, N., Laplace, N., Hosni, M. A., Garcia Lozcano, E. L., Blaj, S., Piso, P., Giorgio, A. D., Vizzelli, G., Brigand, C., Delhorme, J. B., Klipfel, A., Archid, R., Nadiradze, G., Reymond, M. A., Sgarbura, O. (2021). Current practice and perceptions of safety protocols for the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the operating room: results of the IP-OR international survey. Pleura and Peritoneum, 6(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0148

37. Delhorme, J. B., Klipfel, A., D’Antonio, F., Greget, M. C., Diemunsch, P., Rohr, S., Romain, B., Brigand, C. (2019). Occupational safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in an operating room without laminar airflow. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 156(6), 485-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.06.010

38. Jung, W., Park, M., Park, S. J., Lee, E. J., Kim, H. S., Chung, S. H., Yoon, C. (2023). Occupational Exposure during Intraperitoneal Pressurized Aerosol Chemotherapy Using Doxorubicin in a Pig Model. Safety Health Work, 14(2), 237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.04.002

39. Leso, V., Sottani, C., Santocono, C., Russo, F., Grignani, E., Iavicoli, I. (2022). Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Occupational Settings: A Systematic Review of Biological Monitoring Data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 2-25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063737

40. Ndaw, S., Hanser, O. , Kenepekian, V., Vidal, M., Melczer, M., Remy, A., Robert, A., Bakrin, N. (2018). Occupational exposure to platinum drugs during intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Biomonitoring and surface contamination. Toxicology Letters, 1:298, 171-176. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.05.031.

41. Roussin, F., Taibi A., Canal-Raffin M., Cantournet L., Durand-Fontanier S., Druet-Cabanac M. , El Balkhi S. , Maillan G . (2021). Assessment of workplace environmental contamination and occupational exposure to cisplatin and doxorubicin aerosols during electrostatic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 47(11), 2939-2947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.020

42. Larroque, M., Arnaudguilhem, C., Bouyssiere, B., Quenet, F., Bouazza, N., Jarlier, M., Boulabas, S., Mounicou, S., Sgarbura, O. (2021). Evaluation of the environmental contamination and exposure risk in medical/non-medical staff after oxaliplatin-based pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 429:115694. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2021.115694.

43. Lancharro, P. M., Iglesias, N. C-A., González-Barcala, F-J., Moure González, J. D. (2016). Evidence of exposure to cytostatic drugs in healthcare staff: a review of recent literatureEvidencia de la exposición a fármacos citostáticos del personal sanitario: revisión de la literatura reciente. Farmacia Hospitalaria, 40(6), 604-621. https://doi.org/10.7399/fh.2016.40.6.9103

44. Power, L. A., Coyne, J. W. (2018). ASHP Guidelines on Handling Hazardous Drugs. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 75(24), 1996-2031, https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp180564

45. Yoshida, J., Tei, G., Mochizuki C., Masu, Y., Koda, S., Kumagai, S. (2009). Use of a closed system device to reduce occupational contamination and exposure to antineoplastic drugs in the hospital work environment. Ann Occup Hyg., 53(2), 153-60. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men081

46. Easty, A. C., Coakley, N., Cheng, R., Cividino, M., Savage, P., Tozer, R., White, R.E. (2015). Safe handling of cytotoxics: guideline recommendations. Curr Oncol., 22(1), e27-e37. doi: 10.3747/co.21.2151.

47. Hodson, L., Ovesen, J., Couch, J., Hirst, D., Lawson, C., Lentz, T. J., MacKenzie, B., Mead, K., Cincinnati, O. H. (2023). Managing hazardous drug exposures: information for healthcare settings. NIOSH. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2023-130. https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2023130

48. Siderov, J., Kirsa, S., McLauchlan, R. (2010). Reducing workplace cytotoxic surface contamination using a closed-system drug transfer device. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 16(1), 19-25. doi: 10.1177/1078155209352543.

49. Navarro, D., Epstein, D. (2025). A twenty-eight-day evaluation of cytotoxic drug vapor containment in drug-binding closed-system transfer device. Front. Public Health, 13, 1400571. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1400571

50. Capoor, M. R., Bhowmik, K. T. (2017). Cytotoxic Drug Dispersal, Cytotoxic Safety, and Cytotoxic Waste Management: Practices and Proposed India-specific Guidelines. Indian Journa of Medical and Paediatric Oncology, 38(2), 190-197. doi: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_174_16

51. Girardot-Miglierina, A., Clerc, D., Alyami, M., Villeneuve, L., Sgarbura, O., Reymond, M-A., Hubner, M. (2021). Consensus statement on safety measures for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Pleura Peritoneum, 6(4), 139-149. doi: 10.1515/pp-2021-0125

52. Macedo, F., Ladeira, K., Martins, S.F. (2018). Gastric cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: revising an option for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment, 4 (8), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2017.72

53. Shree, V., Lim, T. J., Lean, L. L., Jimmy So, B.Y., Kim, G. (2020). Anaesthesia considerations and techniques for Pressurised IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura and Peritoneum, 5(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2019-0013

54. Rouche, A., Hubner, M., Grass, F., Pache, B., Demartines, N., Blanc, C. (2020). Anaesthesia in a Toxic Environment: Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiol & Reanimation, 48(4), 273-279. Doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.15493

55. Swierczynski, G., Canal‐Raffin, M., Tuduri, L. (2025). Gloves Standards and Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in the European Context. Health Science Reports, 8(3), e70592. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70592

56. Yadav, A. K., Sahu, R. K., Sharma, R. N., Tripath, M. (2021). Role and responsibility of operating room nurse in preparation operation theatre for HIPEC and cytoreductive surgery in the tertiary health center in north India. International Journal of Advance Research in Nursing, 4(2), 211-215. https://doi.org/10.33545/nursing.2021.v4.i2.D.207

57. Keiler, R., Quicho, R., Jorgenson, C., Pew, C., Fry, H. M., Hinckley, C., (2021). Joint Commission International Standards for Hospitals for Hospitals. 7th Edition

58. Ashley, K., Brisson, M. J., White, K. T. (2011). Review of Standards for Surface and Dermal Sampling. Journal of ASTM International, 8(6), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI103678

59. Mai Le, L. M., Jolivot, P. A., Yaye, H. S., Rieutord, A., Bellanger, A., Pradeau, D., Barbault-Foucher, S., Caudron, E. (2013). Effectiveness of cleaning of workplace cytotoxic surface. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 86(3), 333-341. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0769-1

60. Borghi, F., Zellino, C., Zago, A., De Vito, G., Del Vecchio, R.L., Cattaneo, A., Spinazze, A., Cavallo, D. M. (2024). Exposure Assessment and Monitoring of Antiblastic Drugs Preparation in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review. La Medicina Del Lavoro, 115(2), 1-17. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v115i2.15609.

61. Gerding, J., Wai, Ng S., Crauste-Manciet, S. (2023). Occupational Safety and Health. Le Brun P., Crauste-Manciet S., Kramer I., Smith J., Woerdenbag H. (Ed.). Practical Pharmaceutics (pp.605-621). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20298-8?page=3#toc

62. Turci, R., Sottani, C., Spagnoli, G., Minoia, C. (2003). Biological and environmental monitoring of hospital personnel exposed to antineoplastic agents: a review of analytical methods. Journal of Chromatography B, 789(2), 169-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(03)00100-4

63. Portilha Cunha, M.F., Norton, P., Alves, A., Ribeiro, A. R. L., Silva, A. M. T., Santos, M. S. F. (2025). Antineoplastic drugs in healthcare settings: Occupational exposure and risk graduation. Emerging Contaminants, 11(1), 100418.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100418


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Berkembayeva A.L., Burkitbayev Zh.K., Zainulina J.А., Kuanysh Zh.M., Kerimkulov A.К., Dushimova Z. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY IN THE TREATMENT OF PERITONEAL METASTASES USING THE PRESSURIZED INTRAPERITONEAL AEROSOL CHEMOTHERAPY METHOD: A SCOPING REVIEW. Actual Problems of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine. 2025;(3). https://doi.org/10.64854/2790-1289-2025-49-3-10

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2790-1289 (Print)
ISSN 2790-1297 (Online)