Preview

Actual Problems of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine

Advanced search

LONG-TERM (FOLLOW-UP TO 4 YEARS) RESULTS OF CORONARY ARTERY BYP ASS GRAFT AND PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN NATIVE MULTIVESSEL CORONA RY ARTERY DISEASE FOR PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS

https://doi.org/10.24412/2790-1289-2023-1-12-21

Abstract

Long-term survival of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with multivessel disease is associated with the completeness of coronary artery revascularization. This is largely true for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term overall and cardiovascular survival of patients after coronary bypass surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with native multivessel disease in patients with diabetes mellitus compared with patients without diabetes.
Material and methods. A prospective non-randomized study included 1192 people with significant multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent CABG or PCI for this reason in 2018-2022. The choice of the revascularization method was determined by the decision of the cardioteam, which included a cardiologist, an X-ray surgeon, and a cardiovascular surgeon. 426 patients underwent CABG and 766 patients received PCI with coronary stent implantation. Of these, 25.5% (304 patients) had type II DM detected before intervention. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and PGS (Patient Glycemic Status) were determined before surgery in all patients with DM, fasting glycated hemoglobin was divided into < 6.5%, < 7.0%, < 7.5%, < 8, 0% and 8.0% and above. PGS was divided into less than 35, 35-100, 100-150 and above 150.
In all patients, before and after revascularization, the initial (iSS) and residual (rSS) SYNTAX score (SS) were determined. According to their levels, patients were divided into iSS less than 23, iSS 23-32 and iSS above 32. Postoperative calculation of rSS was also carried out: rSS=0 (complete revascularization) and rSS>0 (incomplete revascularization), and it was subdivided into rSS=1-4, rSS=5-8, rSS>8.
Results. Hospital survival in the CABG group was 99.5%, and in the PCI group 99.8% (P=NS). In the DM subgroup after CABG, in-hospital survival was 99.1%, and after PCI it was 99.4% (P=NS).
Long-term survival up to 4 years was 93.2% in the CABG group and 94.1% in the PCI group. Among patients with DM, the long-term survival up to 4 years was 81.0% in the CABG group, and 83.5% in the PCI group.
The level of glycated hemoglobin above 7.5% and PGS=100-150 became significant predictors of in-hospital survival for CABG and PCI by univariate and multivariate regression analysis with sequential inclusion of variables. PGS over 100 and rSS>8 were significant predictors of long-term survival up to 4 years in the CABG and DM group, and rSS>0 was significant predictor of longterm survival in the PCI and DM group.
Conclusions. The immediate (inhospital) survival in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes is affected by the level of glycated hemoglobin above 7.5% and PGS=100-150. Long-term survival up to 4 years after CABG is affected by a high residual SYNTAX index (rSS>8) and poor glycemic status of the patient (GSP) 100-150, and survival after PCI in the same period is affected by any incomplete coronary artery revascularization (rSS>0).

About the Authors

S. Toygonbaev
Southern Regional Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Kyrgyzstan

Salavat Toygonbaev

Jalal – Abad



T. Batyraliev
Salumbekov University; Bishkek State Hospital of the Kyrgyz – Turkish Friendship
Kyrgyzstan

Talantbek Batyraliev

Bishkek



K. Abdramanov
Southern Regional Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Kyrgyzstan

Kaldarbek Abdramanov

Jalal – Abad



J. Imetova
Osh State University
Kyrgyzstan

Jazgul Imetova

Osh



R. Kalmatov
Osh State University
Kyrgyzstan

Romanbek Kalmatov

Osh



N. Jainakbayev
Kazakh-Russian Medical University
Kazakhstan

Nurlan Jainakbayev

Almaty



A. Seidalin
Kazakh-Russian Medical University
Kazakhstan

Arystan Seidalin

Almaty



A. Mansharipova
Kazakh-Russian Medical University
Kazakhstan

Almagul Mansharipova

Almaty



I. Pershukov
Osh State University; Kazakh-Russian Medical University
Kyrgyzstan

Igor Pershukov

Osh

Almaty



References

1. Naito R., Miyauchi K. Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int Heart J. 2017 Aug 3; 58 (4):475-480. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-191. Epub 2017 Jul 14. PMID: 28717115.

2. Godoy L.C., Tavares CAM, Farkouh M.E. Weighing Coronary Revascularization Options in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Can J Diabetes. 2020 Feb; 44(1):78-85. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

3. Kapur A., Bartolini D., Finlay M.C., Qureshi A.C., Flather M., Strange J.W., Hall RJ.J. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan; 11 (1):26-33. doi:10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32. PMID: 19797974.

4. Godoy L.C., Ko D.T., Rao V., Farkouh M.E. The Role of coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous intervention in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jul-Aug; 62(4):358-363. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Aug 1.PMID: 31377224.

5. Koskinas K.C., Windecker S. Revascularization in complex multivessel coronary artery disease after FREEDOM. Is there an indication for PCI and drug-eluting stents? Herz. 2016 May; 41(3):224-32. doi:10.1007/s00059-016-4418-4.PMID: 27048841.

6. Flaherty J.D., Davidson C.J. Diabetes and coronary revascularization. JAMA. 2005 Mar 23; 293(12):1501-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1501. PMID: 15784875.

7. El-Andari R., Bozso S.J., Fialka N.M., Kang JJH, Nagendran J., Nagendran J. Coronary Revascularization for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1; 275(6):1058-1066. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005391. Epub 2022 Jan 25. PMID: 35081569.

8. Balabolkin M.I., Klebanova E.M., Kreminskaia VM. New classification, diagnostic criteria and compensation of diabetes mellitus. Ter Arkh 2000;72(10):5-10. PMID: 11220878.

9. Capodanno D., Chisari A., Giacoppo D., Bonura S., Lavanco V., Capranzano P., Caggegi A., Ministeri M., Tamburino C. Objectifying the impact of incomplete revascularization by repeat angiographic risk assessment with the residual SYNTAX score after left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):333-40. doi:10.1002/ccd.24642. Epub 2013 Apr 8. PMID: 22936604.

10. Farooq V., Serruys P.W., Garcia-Garcia H.M., Zhang Y., Bourantas C.V., Holmes D.R., Mack M., Feldman T., Morice M.C., Ståhle E., et al. The negative impact of incomplete angiographic revascularization on clinical outcomes and its association with total occlusions: the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:282–294. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.017.

11. Takahashi K., Serruys P.W., Gao C., et al. on behalf of the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study Investigators. Ten-Year All-Cause Death According to Completeness of Revascularization in Patients with Three-Vessel Disease or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. Insights from the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study. Circulation. 2021; 144:96–109. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046289.

12. Kobayashi Y., Lønborg J., Jong A., et al. on behalf of the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI, FAME, and FAMOUSNSTEMI Study Investigators. Prognostic Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score after Functionally Complete Revascularization in ACS. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 1321–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.069.

13. Batyraliev T.A., Fetcer D.V., Preobrazhenskij D.V., Pershukov I.V., Akylbekov M., Belenkov Ju.N. Optimal'nyj metod revaskuljarizacii u bol'nyh s mnogososudistym porazheniem koronarnyh arterij pri primenenii stentov, vydeljajushhih lekarstva: chreskozhnye koronarnye vmeshatel'stva po sravneniju s koronarnym shuntirovaniem. Kardiologija 2010; 2:84-90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20146685/.

14. Head S.J., Milojevic M., Daemen J., Ahn J.M., Boersma E., Christiansen E.H., Domanski M.J., Farkouh M.E., Flather M., Fuster V., et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2018; 391: 939–948. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (18) 30423-9.


Review

For citations:


Toygonbaev S., Batyraliev T., Abdramanov K., Imetova J., Kalmatov R., Jainakbayev N., Seidalin A., Mansharipova A., Pershukov I. LONG-TERM (FOLLOW-UP TO 4 YEARS) RESULTS OF CORONARY ARTERY BYP ASS GRAFT AND PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN NATIVE MULTIVESSEL CORONA RY ARTERY DISEASE FOR PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS. Actual Problems of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine. 2023;(1):12-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2790-1289-2023-1-12-21

Views: 242


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2790-1289 (Print)
ISSN 2790-1297 (Online)